제목
(13) 국민연금법과 장애인복지법의 장애개념 및 장애판정체계 비교 연구
작성부서
국민연금연구원
등록일
20140101
조회수
5129
작성자
국민연금연구원
연락처
02-3218-8615
내용

 

국민연금법과 장애인복지법의 장애개념 및 장애판정체계 비교 연구

 

요 약 ···································································································· 11


Ⅰ. 서 론 ·······························································································37
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ································································37
2. 연구내용 및 구성 ·········································································39
3. 연구방법 ·······················································································39
4. 연구의 제한점 ··············································································40


Ⅱ. 장애개념 및 장애판정에 관한 이론적 고찰 ··································41
1. 장애개념 ·······················································································41
2. 장애평가 방법 ··············································································47
3. OECD 국가의 장애개념 및 장애판정 동향 ································51


Ⅲ. 국민연금법과 장애인복지법의 장애판정체계 비교 ·······················79
1. 국민연금법 ····················································································79
2. 장애인복지법 ················································································95
3. 국민연금법과 장애인복지법의 장애판정기준 관련 비교 ··········111


Ⅳ. 해외 장애관련 제도의 장애개념 및 장애판정체계 분석 ············169
1. 영국 ····························································································169
2. 미국 ····························································································179
3. 독일 ····························································································198
4. 캐나다 ·························································································204
5. 주요국의 장애정의 및 장애판정 방법 비교 ······························211
6. 해외사례 요약 및 시사점 ··························································214


Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책제언 ·········································································219
1. 국민연급법과 장애인복지법의 장애판정기준 일원화의 타당성 검토 ···219
2. 정책제언 ·····················································································222


참 고 문 헌 ·························································································231


부록 ······································································································235

첨부
06-국민연금법과_장애인복지법의_장애개념_및_장애판정체계_비교연구_보고서_최종.pdf
목록
다음글
(13) 공공영역 노후설계 서비스의 역할과 기능
이전글
(13) 국민연금 가입자의 가입이력과 급여수준 분석